مقاله شیکاگو تریبون در باره اظهارات موسویان ,آب نبات در برابر مروارید
اگر غرب آمادگی نداشته باشد که تحریم ھا را به تدریج حذف
کند و حق غنی سازی ایران را به رسميت بشناسد، من بعيد می دانم مذاکرات مسکو به نتيجه ای
برسد
اهداف مهم ان پی تی. هنوز محقق نشده است -موسویان
به گزارش خبرگزاری مهر به نقل از سایت اینترنتی کمپین کسمی، سید حسین موسویان مذاکره کننده سابق هسته ای در این مقاله می نویسد: با وجود پیوستن در حدود 190 کشور جهان به ان پی تی. و با گذشت چهار دهه از تاسیس این پیمان اهداف مهم آن محقق نشده است.
وی می نویسد: نخستین و مهمترین هدف این پیمان خلع سلاح کشورهای دارنده تسلیحات هسته ای از جمله؛ چین، روسیه، بریتانیا، فرانسه، و آمریکا دومین هدف ممانعت از اشاعه هسته ای و فناوری های مربوط به تسلیحات هسته ای و سومین هدف آن تضمین همکاری در حوزه انرژی هسته‌ای صلح آمیز و ارائه فناوری هسته ای از سوی دارندگان آن به کشورهایی دیگر است.
دیلی تلگراف -اسرائيل کوچک تر از آن است که بتواند به ايران حمله کند
اسرائيل کوچک تر از آن است که بتواند به ايران حمله کند
مذاکره کننده سابق هسته ای ایران می گوید: ایرانی ها اسرائیل را کوچک تر از آن می دانند که بتواند دست به اقدامی یک جانبه بزند.
An Opportunity for a U.S.–Iran Paradigm Shift
America as a superpower has had a longstanding interest in the Middle East, and thus is no stranger to the region. Unfortunately, the continuing U.S. domination in the Middle East with its flawed policies is creating strategic imbalances in the region and fueling intra-/regional tensions with serious implications for the overall peace and security of the region. The flawed U.S. polices in the Middle East are already leading to its total alienation from the region’s people. A recent poll the first of its kind in the region, conducted in twelve Arab countries covering 84 percent of the population of the Arab world shows 93.75 percent of the people look at the Unites States and Israel as the major threat to their interests.1 Growing anti-/Americanism in the Arab world is no secret.
Hossein Mousavian, “An Opportunity for a U.S.–Iran Paradigm Shift.” The Washington Quarterly 36, no. 1 (pgs. 129-144). Published by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Washington (12/2012).
Iran, the US and Weapons of Mass Destruction
The United States has launched, in effect, an economic, political, cyber and covert war with Iran. American–Iranian relations could reach a turning point within a year. Without substantial progress on the diplomatic front, the chance for a unilateral Israeli or a joint US–Israeli military campaign aimed at destroying the Iranian nuclear programme could become a probability. Any attempt to reorient the current diplomatic trajectory will require a better understanding of the dispute between Tehran and Washington over nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
Hossein Mousavian, “Iran, the US and Weapons of Mass Destruction.” Survival 54, no. 5 (pgs. 183-202). Published by the International Institute for Strategic Studies, London (10/2012).
Ten Reasons Iran Doesn’t Want the Bomb
Since the beginning of Iran’s nuclear crisis, the West has been convinced that one approach offers the best hope of altering Tehran’s nuclear policy and halting its enrichment activities: comprehensive international sanctions and a credible threat of military strike. During the same period, I have repeatedly warned my friends in the West that such punitive pressures, no matter how severe, will not change the Iranian leadership’s mindset, and that a military option would be catastrophic for Iran, the region and beyond.
“Ten Reasons Iran Doesn’t Want the Bomb,” National Interest, December 4, 2012.
Obama must offer a ‘grand deal’ with Iran on its nuclear program
For Iran, the nuclear crisis has become the most important national security and foreign policy challenge since the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s. The country may not be losing hundreds of thousands of soldiers and civilians to a hot war. But it is enduring the most severe sanctions in its history, foreign assassinations of its scientists, and international pressure that has shaken the foundation of its relations regionally, and with Western and Eastern powers. It would not be unrealistic to conclude that Iran has already paid the price for a nuclear bomb.
“Obama must offer a ‘grand deal’ with Iran on its nuclear program,” The Christian Science Monitor, November 28, 2012.
Iran and Hamas Winners In Gaza Conflict
The eight-day conflict between Hamas and Israel has ended in a cease-fire. Although shorter than Operation Cast Lead in 2008-09, the latest Israeli Operation Pillar of Defense was nevertheless devastating. Israeli naval and air bombardments killed 165 and wounded 1,200 Palestinians, while damage to Gaza’s infrastructure amounted to $1.2 billion. The rockets fired from Gaza resulted in five Israeli deaths and scores wounded.
“Iran and Hamas Winners In Gaza Conflict,” Al-Monitor, November 27, 2012.
Red line on Iran: No, here are Netanyahu’s real objectives
Although US officials do not believe Iran has decided to build a nuclear bomb, Israel has gone into overdrive to convince the world that Iran is on the verge of acquiring a nuclear weapon and must have all its uranium enrichment activities stopped by all means possible, including the military option. Under Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s leadership, these efforts thus far have not garnered much support.
“Red line on Iran: No, here are Netanyahu’s real objectives,” Boston Globe, October 9, 2012
