“Nuclear deal and Iran’s future as regional power,” The Chautauqua Institute, August 21, 2015.
Coverage: “Kiyaei, Mousavian discuss nuclear deal and Iran’s future as regional power,” Sam Flynn, The Chautauquan Daily, August 22, 2015.
“Nuclear deal and Iran’s future as regional power,” The Chautauqua Institute, August 21, 2015.
Coverage: “Kiyaei, Mousavian discuss nuclear deal and Iran’s future as regional power,” Sam Flynn, The Chautauquan Daily, August 22, 2015.
آژانس هیچگاه انحراف ایران به سمت ساخت سلاح هستهای را تایید نکرد – حسین موسویان – ایلنا – دوشنبه ۱۸ آبان ۱۳۹۴
استراتژی ایران دربارۀ سلاح کشتارجمعی و برجام را در بزرگترین کانون وکلای جهان تشریح کرد – حسین موسویان – کنفرانس سالیانه کانون وکلای آمریکا – خبرآنلاین – دوشنبه ۱۸ آبان ۱۳۹۴
اگر حمایت رهبر انقلاب نبود، تندروها توافق هستهای را نابود میکردند – حسین موسویان – آنا – چهارشنبه ۱۳ آبان ۱۳۹۴
حل و فصل بحران های منطقه بدون حضور ایران ممکن نیست – حسین موسویان – خبرآنلاین – چهارشنبه ۱۳ آبان ۱۳۹۴
آمریکا برای دعوت ایران به مذاکرات سوریه، در پشت پرده به عربستان فشار آورد – حسین موسویان – خبرآنلاین – دوشنبه ۱۱ آبان ۱۳۹۴
ایران ثابت کرده طرفدار حکومت اکثریت است، خواه سنی یا شیعه باشد – حسین موسویان – آنا – دوشنبه ۱۱ آبان ۱۳۹۴
Ayatollah Khamenei first permitted direct negotiations between Iran and the United States on the nuclear issue after US President Barack Obama came into office, during the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Direct talks were held first in Vienna in 2009 and continued in Muscat in 2012. With the election of Rouhani in June 2013, a more professional nuclear negotiating team was appointed and a more favorable international political climate for serious negotiations was created. To accommodate a nuclear deal, Ayatollah Khamenei gave permission again for direct talks between Iran and United States, allowing for the bilateral negotiations that proved to be the critical prerequisite to the nuclear deal to eventually be reached.
Indeed, it is of crucial importance to note that the Rouhani administration would not have been able to reach and uphold the nuclear deal without the support of Ayatollah Khamenei. Hard-line domestic opponents of Rouhani would have certainly killed the deal if not for the supreme leader’s explicit support for the administration and nuclear negotiators. When the parliament was debating the nuclear deal these past several months, I was in Iran and witnessed firsthand the bellicose nature of the opposition. The rhetoric reached such a level of hostility that at one point a hard-line parliament member menaced Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, threatening to put him and Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization head Ali Akbar Salehi in the “heart” of Iran’s plutonium reactor and “bury” them “in cement.”
“Will Iran’s nuclear diplomacy lead to regional solutions?” Hossein Mousavian, Al Monitor, November 3, 2015.
سرمایه گذاری آمریکا و غرب بر اختلافات داخلی ایران، بین میانه روها یا محافظه کاران، اشتباه خواهد بود. اگر غرب از جمله آمریکا در مسیر رویکردی یکنواخت تر و واقع گرایانه تر در قبال ایران باشد، بی تردید درها به روی همکاری های گسترده و مدیریت سایر بحران ها از جمله در عراق، افغانستان و جنگ با داعش باز خواهد بود.
حل و فصل بحران های منطقه بدون حضور ایران ممکن نیست – حسین موسویان – ایرنا – چهارشنبه ۱۳ آبان ۱۳۹۴
The Pivot to Tehran
For more than four years, the Obama administration has accused Iran of being a chief instigator of Syria’s bloody conflict and has rebuffed persistent appeals by the U.N.’s top peacemakers, who maintained that any durable political settlement would be unthinkable without granting the Islamic Republic a seat at the table. The price of a ticket to peace talks, the State Department long insisted, was an unequivocal commitment from Tehran to endorse a U.N.-brokered peace settlement resulting in a political transition and the departure of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad from power.
“The Pivot to Tehran,” Foreign Policy, October 29, 2015.