Articles, Publications

What Obama should say to King Salman during his visit

The relationship between Iran and its southern Arab neighbors — namely, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states — has been turbulent for the past few decades. The GCC states were under the shadow of Iraq and Iran, the two prevailing powers in the Persian Gulf, for much of the 20th century, with the latter historically being the more dominant power. Stricken with internal disputes, weak central governments and rivalries among themselves, the Arab states along the Persian Gulf’s southern coast were never in a position to challenge the powers to their north.

The situation changed after Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution, which brought political Islam to the geopolitical scene. The autocratic Persian Gulf monarchies immediately felt threatened by this new political force, which had the potential to undermine their legitimacy and jeopardize their rule. Within this context, in 1981 they established the GCC, comprised of Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The outbreak of the Iran-Iraq War in 1980 had provided a convenient excuse to exclude Iraq and Yemen, notable omissions even though the latter does not border on the Persian Gulf, and Iraq has close to 40 miles of coastline.

Read More

What Obama should say to King Salman during his visit,” Hossein Mousavian, Al Monitor, September 4, 2015.

Articles, Publications

A rejection of the nuclear deal could lead to radicalism in Iran

With the ongoing domestic in-fighting in the United States and Iran over the nuclear deal — which has already become legally binding by way of a U.N. Security Council resolution — it has become clear that Congress poses the biggest risk for the deal falling through. Congress’s ability to play a spoiler role comes not only from the power it has to scuttle the deal altogether but also from its efforts at fostering an uncertain atmosphere regarding the removal of sanctions on Iran.

The effectiveness of the nuclear deal will rely largely on the P5+1 instilling confidence in the global business community that sanctions have been removed and the country is open for business. Truly removing sanctions in a way that would have tangible benefits for Iran would require shaping expectations in such a way that businesses do not feel their investments are precarious and susceptible to the political machinations of Congress or a future U.S. president.

Read More

A rejection of the nuclear deal could lead to radicalism in Iran,” Hossein Mousavian, The Washington Post, August 28, 2015.

انتشارات, مقاله ها

تاکید موسویان بر تعامل سازنده میان ایران و شورای همکاری خلیج‌فارس

این وضعیت پس از وقوع انقلاب اسلامی ایران در سال 1979 تغییر کرد. حکوت‌های سلطنتی مستقل در حاشیه خلیج فارس به سرعت از این نیروی سیاسی جدید احساس خطر کردند که پتانسیل لازم برای تضعیف مشروعیت آن‌ها به خطر انداختن فرمانروایی‌شان را داشت. در این میان آن‌ها در سال 1981 شورای همکاری خلیج (فارس) را با حضور بحرین، کویت، قطر، عمان، عربستان و امارات متحده عربی تشکیل دادند.

ادامه مطلب

تاکید موسویان بر تعامل سازنده میان ایران و شورای همکاری خلیج‌فارس – حسین موسویان – ایسنا – شنبه ۱۴ شهریور ۱۳۹۴